Indian Legal Compliance System

TheV12ofregulatoryengines.

Every government deadline your company has, in one register. The right person gets an email before each date, the form data is filled and waiting, and when you file, the next deadline sets itself.

Free. No credit card required.

COMPLIANCE REGISTERACME FINTECH PVT LTD
§ 01File GSTR-3BCGST Act, s. 3920 Jul
§ 02TDS return (24Q)IT Act, s. 200(3)31 JulUpcoming
§ 03Board meeting (Q2)Companies Act, s. 17330 JunCompleted
reminder sent → Company Secretary <cs@acmefintech.in>
The System

It watches the calendar so you don't.

Add a deadline once. What follows is the system's job — watch one obligation run its full year, below.

File Annual Return (MGT-7)
Companies Act 2013, s. 92 · Acme Fintech Pvt Ltd
14days until due
DUE SOON
REMINDER · SENT AUTOMATICALLY
To: Company Secretary <cs@acmefintech.in>
MGT-7 due in 7 days — data sheet ready.
Filed · On the record
Next instance opened automatically → due 29 Nov 2027
The Register

What it runs for you.

§ 01RegisterEvery obligation in one statute-referenced ledger.§ Companies Act 2013, s. 92
§ 02RecurrenceMonthly, quarterly, annual — the next date computes itself.↻ next · 30 Nov 2027
§ 03AssignmentObligations route to a person, not an inbox.To: Company Secretary <cs@acme.com>
§ 04RemindersAn email before every due date. CC anyone.Due SoonOverdueCompleted
§ 05TeamOne shared register for the whole company, by invite.1 OWNER · 4 MEMBERS
§ 06AuditWho filed, when, with notes — on the record.✓ Filed 12 Jun 2026 — CS
§ 07Filing dataEntity records fill every e-form — accurately, once.CIN · PAN · GSTIN → MGT-7
§ 08SecurityStatutory identifiers encrypted before they touch the database.AES-256-GCM
The Difference

One of these is useful. One just sounds useful.

Generic response

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, there are provisions for corporate insolvency. The resolution process generally involves various stakeholders. You may want to consider consulting a legal professional who specialises in this area, as the specifics of your situation could affect the outcome significantly. Legal interpretations in this domain continue to evolve.

Structured output
ClauseIQHigh
LEGAL ISSUE
Personal guarantor liability under IBC 2016

APPLICABLE LAW
S.31, IBC 2016 — approved resolution plan
binding on personal guarantors.

KEY JUDGMENT
Lalit Kumar Jain v. Union of India
(2021) 9 SCC 321 — SC upheld Part III,
personal guarantors subject to CIRP.

CONFIDENCE: High
Confidence · HighClauseIQ Register
Practice Areas

Six areas. Each one properly sourced.

§ 01LitigationSC and HC citations, SCC format.
§ 02Insolvency & IBCCIRP, guarantor liability, CoC rights.
§ 03Corporate & Companies ActBoard approvals, RPTs, MCA filings.
§ 04Tax & GSTGST interpretation, TDS, corporate tax.
§ 05Dispute ResolutionArbitration under the A&C Act 1996.
§ 06Fraud & InvestigationSFIO process, IPC sections, evidence.

“Cuts the Manupatra search time considerably. Gives the judgment number, not a paraphrase of a paraphrase.”

M.S. · Intern, HC Delhi Chambers
Pricing

Start free. Bring the team when you're ready.

Free

₹0

The full system · 5 queries a day

Get started
Most popular

Student

₹299/mo

The system + unlimited research

Early access

Professional

₹999/mo

Unlimited research + priority

Early access